IRAN: THE BORDER LANDS
Neighbours and (sometimes) Friends
Persis (Fars) was the homeland of the Achaemenid dynasty - the location of major sites such as Persepolis, Pasargadae and Naqsh-e Rustam. It may seem strange to find it classed as a "neighbour". But for 500 years after the sack of Persepolis (Parsa), it was no longer at the centre, and in fact very much on the margins of the Iranian world.
The mysterious "lion v bull" motif at Persepolis
After the last Achaemenid, Darius III, was defeated by Alexander (and subsequently murdered by Bessus, the satrap of Bactria), the satrapy of Persis was allocated to the Macedonian Peucestas. This was a special honour for one of Alexander's most valued officers - the bearer of the sacred shield from Troy, and one credited with saving his life in a battle in India. After Alexander died, he kept his position - and became very popular with the Persian aristocracy because - alone of Alexander's successors - he took the trouble to learn Persian, adopt Persian dress, and fit in with the existing ruling class. He's also remembered for having organised a particularly impressive banquet for his Persian friends. No doubt this had much to do with consolidating his position in the turmoil of the decade after Alexander; he was put in charge of all the eastern satrapies. Later he found himself, reluctantly, having to support Eumenes. At the Battle of Gabiene in 316 BC, his treachery, incompetence, or maybe just arrogance, led to Eumenes' defeat. His was removed from his satrapy by the victor Antigonus, and apparently returned to Macedonia.
Kings of Persis
Inspired no doubt by the semi-independence enjoyed by Peucestas, local dynasts found that they could rule unopposed by the Macedonian (and later Parthian) overlords, provided they showed support for the regime. We know the names of these rulers, from Baydad (end of 3rd century BC) to Shapur (start of 3rd century AD: he was the brother of Ardashir I, the founder of the Sasanian dynasty). Their names are known from their coinage - and the fact they they issued their own coins over this long period shows how independent they were allowed to be. They were not Achaemenids, and certainly did not call themselves "Great Kings". They continued supporting the Macedonians as long as it was advantageous - then transferred their allegiance to the Parthians. Little is known beyond what can be deduced from the coinage (which was modelled on that of the Parthians) - but it would seem that it was during this half millennium that the memory of the Achaemenids began to fade.
The Sasanian dynasty originated from the ruling family of Persis, and was well aware that it was truly "Persian" after the Arsacid dynasty with its roots in the northeast of the Iranian plateau. It was also aware of the religious basis of kingship - the "farr" of the Sasanians derives ultimately from the special relationship claimed by Darius I and his successors with Ahura Mazda. The priestly class, the Magi, would have tried to preserve the continuity as best they could (without written records, of course at this period). But it's clear that the Sasanians had no specific knowlege of their Achaemenid predecessors.
Their home base was at Estakhr, a few miles only from Persepolis, and it remained an important religious centre after the Sasanians moved their capital to Ctesiphon.
Fading light over the scanty remains of the city of Estakhr, Fars.
The coast and the Persian Gulf
Ports were established on both sides of the Persian Gulf during the reign of Ardashir I, founder of the Sasanian dynasty. Goods were moved inland to Shiraz and Firuzabad brought by sea from Asia and East Africa (evidence from finds of pottery and coins). Whether there was a Sasanian navy is not known, but evidence points towards increasing trading activity in the gulf. Ammianus Marcellinus, referring to the reign of the first Parthian king, Arsaces I, describes the scene:
All down its coast are towns and villages close together, and continual comings and goings of boats.
By the 6th century, Sasanian monopoly of trade (especially silk) with India and the east led to clashes with the Byzantines. This encouraged the Sasanians to annex territory in South Arabia.
Loss and rediscovery
In AD 311, a visitor to Persepolis left an inscription commemorating his visit:
Shapur, the king of the Saka, king of India, Sakistan and Turan ... travelled on this road from Estakhr to Sakistan (Seistan), and came here to sad-sutun*. He ate bread in this building ... And he organised a great feast ... and he prayed for his father and his ancestors, and he prayed for Shapur, the king of kings, and he prayed for his own soul, and he also prayed for the one who had this building constructed.
Clearly the royal visitor had no knowledge of the significance of Persepolis, or even its name - to him it was *"The Hundred Columns": simply a rather good spot for a picnic on his way home! Persepolis was also sometimes known to the Sasanians as "The Thousand Columns" or (less impressively) "The Forty Columns". During the Parthian period it had become "The Throne of Jamshid" (Takht-e Jamshid - which it's still known as in Iran today). Similarly, the geat cliff displaying the Achaemenid tombs became Naqsh-e Rustam ("Picture of Rustam"): the association with the Kayanian hero Rustam being because it was thought that a figure (actally Elamite - predating the Achaemenids) was him. Later still, the sites were associated with characters from the Jewish/Muslim traditions: Cyrus' tomb at Pasargadae became "The Tomb of Solomon's Mother", and the tower on the site "Solomon's Prison". The fire-temple at Estakhr became "Solomon's Mosque".
Cyrus I's tomb at Pasargadae, aka The Tomb of Solomon's Mother