Son of Cyrus - the second Achaemenid 530 - 522 BC
Cyrus was succeeded by his son, Cambyses (Kambujiya). There are no Persian sources for his reign we have to rely on Herodotus once again, although there are some Egyptian records which are interesting, and suggest a different interpretation.
Conquest of Egypt
When Cyrus died, it was always going to be difficult for his successor to control so vast a territory. But the biggest problem facing Cambyses was Egypt. Egypt felt threatened by the Persian advance to the Mediterranean, and the Pharaoh Amasis, allied to the Greek Polycrates of Samos, was looking to expand and had already grabbed the island of Cyprus. But the Persians managed to neutralise Polycrates, and occupy Cyprus. The Phoenicians, who had provided the navy for the Egyptians, also defected to the Persian side. The Egyptians, under their new Pharaoh Psamtek III (Psammetichos or Psammenitus in Greek), son of Amasis, were on their own.
First, here is an Egyptian account of Cambyses’ conquest (It’s part of a hieroglyphic inscription on a statue of Udjahorresnet, an Egyptian doctor at the court of the Pharaoh):
The Great Chief of all foreign lands, Cambyses, came to Egypt, the foreign peoples of every foreign land being with him. He gained the majesty of this land in its entirety. They established themselves in it, and he was Great Ruler of Egypt and Great Chief of all foreign lands. His majesty assigned to me the office of chief physician. He made me live at his side as a friend and administrator of the palace. I caused his majesty to recognise the greatness of the temple of Neith-the-Great, the mother who bore Re and of all the gods and goddesses.
I made a petition to the majesty of the King of Upper and Lower Egypt, Cambyses, about all the foreigners who dwelled in the temple of Neith, in order to have them expelled from it, so as to let the temple of Neith be in all its splendour, as it had been before. His Majesty commanded to expel all the foreigners who dwelled in the temple of Neith, to demolish all their houses and all their unclean things that were in the temple.
Cambyses, apparently, adopted the Egyptian titles, and was sympathetic to Egyptian religion. As you’d expect by now, though, the Greek story is far more exciting! Cambyses in Herodotus is mad, cruel and disrespectful of everything Egyptian. But is this portrait true?
The Egyptian campaign
Herodotus is quite vague about the military details:
The desert is apparently the only land route leading into Egypt. From Phoenicia to the boundary of Gaza, the land belongs to the Syrians called Palestinians
The Persians marched across the desert [elsewhere Herodotus says it was a three-day journey] and took up their position [at the Pelusian mouth of the Nile] near the Egyptians to prepare to meet them in battle.
Instead of describing the battle, Herodotus seems more interested in telling us that it rained in Thebes (“which had never happened before, or afterwards up to my own time”) and how the dead Egyptians had thicker skulls than the Persians, because they shaved their heads which were thus strengthened by exposure to sunlight! All he adds about the fighting is:
When the Egyptians were routed in battle, they panicked and ran away in disorder, not stopping until they got to Memphis.
He then continues, telling how Cambyses first humiliated pharaoh Psamtek, and then proceeded to have Amasis’ body removed from its tomb:
He ordered the corpse to be whipped, have its hair pulled out, be stabbed and violated in every possible way. His men eventually became exhausted by these tasks, as the corpse, being embalmed, would not fall apart. So Cambyses ordered them to burn it, which was an outrage against religion, as the Persians believe fire is a god [more on this subject later]
Cambyses' ambition: Carthage and Nubia
Cambyses, having added Egypt to Persian territory, wanted more. He cancelled an attack on Carthage, but was eager to subdue “Ethiopia” (actually Nubia/Sudan) and destroy the oracle of Ammon (which had refused to recognise him as pharaoh), in the desert to the west of Egypt.
The Ethiopian campaign was apparently a desperate failure:
Cambyses set off against the Ethiopians without any provision for food, without thinking that he was about to lead his army to the edge of the world. He was clearly out of his mind.
They ran out of food, and ate the baggage animals until they were all gone too his men survived for a while by eating grass, but when they reached the desert sand they chose one man by lot out of every ten, and ate them …
Cambyses finally turned back. But elsewhere (3.97) Herodotus does mention that Cambyses conquered the Ethiopians. And the appearance of Nubians, among other contingents from all parts of the Persian empire on the decoration at Persepolis, suggests that Herodotus was wrong about the failure of the Sudan expedition.
An Ethiopian at Persepolis, carrying ivory
Meanwhile his force of 50,000 men sent against Ammon suffered an even worse fate …
They travelled with guides and reached the city of Oasis, a seven-day journey across the sand. Once they left Oasis, they marched across the desert towards Ammon, which they never reached. They stopped somewhere along the way, and while they were making breakfast, a wind of extraordinary power started blowing from the south, burying them in sand so that the entire army disappeared.
Thus arose one of the great mysteries of archaeology: what did happen to Cambyses’ lost army? In 2009 Italian archaeologists claimed to have found bronze weapons and human bones in the Sahara, which they thought could be their remains. But, as the incident is mentioned only by Herodotus, many historians doubt if it actually happened.
Cambyses, according to Herodotus soon began showing further signs of insanity. He thought the people of Memphis were celebrating his military defeats: in fact it was a festival in honour of the god Apis, reborn regularly in the form of a bull, which was then treated as a god, with a festival every year, and buried with great ceremony when it died. He stabbed the bull (he’d tried to kill it but missed) which later died. The festival was cancelled, and the priests were whipped. He gave orders that any Egyptians caught celebrating were to be killed.
According to the Egyptians, Cambyses went completely insane because of his crime, though he had not been in his right mind before either.
Herodotus goes on to produce more extreme examples of Cambyses’ madness including the murder of members of his own family, and other Persians. But Herodotus sees the most telling evidence of his insanity in his blatant disrespecting of Egyptian customs, especially their religion.
Only a madman would treat such things as a laughing matter.
Herodotus’ view of Cambyses was followed by most later writers, but should we accept it? The Egyptian tombstone for Apis, the sacred bull, seems to praise Cambyses. Would it have done so if his behaviour was really as Herodotus describes?
Apis tombstone from Egypt
Year 6 of his majesty, King of Upper and Lower Egypt, Mesutire [the Egyptian name for Cambyses] may he live forever the god [ie Apis] was taken peacefully to the West [where the Egyptians believed was the land of the dead] and was placed at rest in the cemetery, in his place, which is the place prepared for him by his majesty, after all the ceremonies in the embalming room had been carried out by him. Offerings were made to him, clothing and every kind of precious stone all was done in accordance with the words of his majesty Cambyses may he live …
You must make you own mind up about Cambyses’ madness. Remember Herodotus was a Greek, and writing nearly a century later, when the people Herodotus spoke to in Egypt might well have grown to dislike Persian rule, and be ready to show Egypt’s conqueror in as bad a light as possible. Even more likely was it that Herodotus wanted make a strong contrast between the “good king” (Cyrus) and the “bad king” (Cambyses).
But the basic fact is clear: Cambyses, carrying out the plan of his father Cyrus, conquered Egypt and added it to the territory the Persians controlled. No Egyptian was to rule an independent Egypt again until Gamal Abdul Nasser seized power from the British in 1952.
Cambyses died in 522 BC in March and was succeeded by his younger brother Bardiya (called Smerdis by Herodotus). This is shown in independent evidence from Babylonian chronicles. But even this simple fact is disputed, and everything that happened around the time of the death of Cambyses is still today highly controversial. We can’t know what really went on: we can only try and work out what the most likely scenario was.